![]() Second, the very low-maintenance nature of the refractor telescope makes it a much more portable companion for all types of on-location observations.By contrast, reflector telescopes require relatively regular adjustments to the mirror, not unlike how guitars need to be tuned on a frequent basis. First, refractor telescopes are self-contained units that require virtually no maintenance or adjustments.Lenses for refractor telescopes are more expensive to produce, which means that refracting telescopes typically carry a higher price tag than similarly-sized reflecting telescopesĪs you can see, both telescopes have their particular merits as well as their disadvantages.įor the beginning stargazer, the most commonly recommended telescope is the refractor for a couple of key reasons:.All refractors suffer from some degree of chromatic aberration, which can produce a purple or rainbow-coloured haze around the image this is due to the varying wavelengths of light being bent by the lenses at different rates.Images appear right-side-up, making this telescope an excellent choice for daytime viewing (e.g., bird watching, etc.). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |